It is harder to defend a system, an allocation scheme or a budget requirements than to stand on the

Home World Correspondent curriculum vitae The World Norway curriculum vitae Home Domestic Politics Osloby Osloby News Byutvikling Oslopuls Soundtrack What-calendar Hungry Restaurant Reviews Resturant Guide Shopping Sprek Oslo's best fix this Bicycle Patrol Sports Football Live TV Daylife Blog Tjærnås blog Stokke Blog Comments 1st Division Women's football National Team England Germany Spain Italy Champions League Supporter Live Cross Country TV Vålerenga Bicycle Hockey Hockey comment Handball curriculum vitae Alpine Biathlon Skip Golf Athletics Tennis Betting Blog Tjærnås blog Stokke Blog Comments Hockey comment Sports Politics Economy Home Inland Global Culture Home Movie Music Literature Reviews Language Opinions Home Comments Chronicles Debate Say: D Leader Signs Hanne Knowledge A magazine Aftenposten TV AZ All about mobile espionage Car Living Digital curriculum vitae Family and adolescence Jobs Home Job Experts Collaborators Food Travel curriculum vitae Currency converter Obituaries ePaper Aftenposten archive Discount Coupons
It is harder to defend a system, an allocation scheme or a budget requirements than to stand on the same side as the individual who fight for a special privilege or an exemption from a cruel rule, writes Erling Roed Larsen. Here Labour Party congress in 2011.
We live in violable time. People are offended - and irritated, angered, indignant. Some are so angry that it goes completely overboard. For most impulse control curriculum vitae pretty good, but one should not read far in comment fields before one discovers an aggressive tone. There, people like the person, not the case.
PHOTO: Signe Dons How it's been like that? It is hardly so man has become more vulnerable than before. The explanation is technological. 100 years ago you managed not to provoke more than those you could shout to the plow or boat. Today, you can provoke millions of people with simple steps on your mobile phone. Unpopular themes
Economists cuts mostly clear, inflation figures and economic analyzes have little provocation force. But economists know that there are three unpopular topics they can write about without risking networks proportionality: regional policy, subsidies and welfare programs.
And then revealed several interesting aspects of provocation anatomy. curriculum vitae Those who provoked, have generally precede a list of approved opinions or a pre-defined morality definitive. Take a (hypothetical) example. One Saturday in nice layer says economist Hansen: "Norway remains with costly social programs."
This teeth Jensens wrath, and he believes Hansen is heartless, unscrupulous or worse (use your imagination). Instead of discussing how Norway would allocate scarce resources, it becomes a sore exchange about who is a good person. "Taking the weakest party
In a broader perspective, it is here economists are struggling - and I must take care not to go in indignasjonsfellen. It is harder to defend a system, an allocation scheme or a budget requirements than to stand on the same side as the individual who fight for a special privilege or an exemption from a cruel rule.
Budget curriculum vitae constraint lures not forward curriculum vitae chants. Cost estimates produces curriculum vitae not good feeling. The future is not present - and can not applaud. Those who support individual cases, however, has a virtually unassailable moral position.
They do not have to defend it intellectually demanding point that not everyone can get exceptions, limit must go somewhere. Not everyone in the world can benefit from Norway's wealth, then we are not rich.
By redefining the issue from turning about the welfare of all in the long term to be one of concrete welfare for one person in the short term, they ensure its position curriculum vitae as the heartwarming.
Assume further that Hansen proposes to look at the sick pay scheme. We are, after all, one of the world's healthiest people - but are among those with the highest absenteeism. It's strange.
She suggests that reduced salary first day could be a possibility. There do not want to hurt the legitimate sick, only the illegitimate "sick." This could give the really sick more resources - not less. Jensen provoked already on the word "reduced". He believes Hansen curriculum vitae is heartless since she thinks of the welfare of the weak. Is it appropriate tag? Absenteeism affects the sick
May not. In Norway, we worked 3.9 billion each year. It is this that creates the Norwegian welfare. It is the pot that keeps the roads being built, schools kept in operation - and sick